tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21734860.post8858875685296058112..comments2021-05-23T09:23:40.339-07:00Comments on Byron's Blog: Five Player Go First DiceByron Knollhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07033149054635249156noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21734860.post-32630131362856830822013-03-11T10:30:36.390-07:002013-03-11T10:30:36.390-07:00@cyrebjr, yeah, I think you are correct.@cyrebjr, yeah, I think you are correct.Byron Knollhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07033149054635249156noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21734860.post-51621756384274853382013-03-11T10:00:35.347-07:002013-03-11T10:00:35.347-07:00I'm losing my ability to read math notation, b...I'm losing my ability to read math notation, but I think you're saying that the differing numbers of dice faces can be fixed to be the same by spreading out the values on the faces.<br /><br />It occurs to me that this makes the "no repeated face values" rule redundant, so long as the requirement of "fairly determining turn order on the first roll" already implies no ties. That is, if values are allowed to repeat on each die but not over multiple dice, there are solutions with smaller numbers that work identically to, say, the given solution.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com