Here are some more results comparing JPEG at the maximum compression level to my image compression algorithm:
Original image:
JPEG (15.7KiB):
My algorithm (3.2KiB):
Original image:
JPEG (6.3KiB):
My algorithm (2.0KiB):
Original image:
JPEG (6.2KiB):
My algorithm (3.9KiB):
Original image:
JPEG (11.2KiB):
My algorithm (2.8KiB):
Original image:
JPEG (7.1KiB):
My algorithm (3.0KiB):
Original image:
JPEG (5.9KiB):
My algorithm (1.5KiB):
Original image:
JPEG (16.4KiB):
My algorithm (4.0KiB):
All of the above images are around 1MiB when uncompressed. In every case my algorithm resulted in a smaller file size and a (arguably) better looking image.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
The image of 256 patches is only 19KB as a png, and around 5KB as a sufficiently high quality jpeg. So, you could embed a color profile specific to the image, and get a much better visual quality, for a modest increase in file size.
Wow, that is a great idea! Thanks, I will try this soon.
Post a Comment